Gryesten explains that the aim of the project “was to approach the scores with fresh ears, mind and spirit, allowing the chosen analysis method to function as the main interpretative lens, leaving behind the patinated baggage of tradition.” From these studies, it is hoped to build revitalised and relevant new performances.
With the help of his colleague Thomas Solak, Gryesten applied
this methodology to Beethoven’s late sonatas. The entire undertaking lasted for
two years and resulted in a “deep exploration of the scores and analytical
graphs, consuming powerful doses of esoteric French philosophy…”
Other outcomes of this project included “workshops for
students, an international seminar on Schenker, some articles, a series of
lecture recitals, and this recording.”
To be sure, Gryesten does give certain clues as to what the putative listener may expect: an “eclectic style” exhibiting “stylistic characteristics which could be heard as belonging to quite diverse epochs and styles.” He admits that there are “elements inspired by historical practice and a close reading of Beethoven’s scores.” The overall impact reveals a “romantic sentiment,” imbued with “occasional jazzy or modernistic details.”
Finally, Gryesten refers his readers to an article which provides
“a thorough explanation of the profound ways, in which a Schenkerian approach
has shaped these interpretations." A link or a reference would have been
helpful…
The booklet, as noted above, is largely concerned with the rationale of the Schenkerian analysis and subsequent reinterpretation of Beethoven’s late piano sonatas. Gryesten has chosen not to provide an “extensive commentary” on each sonata, but to give only some “observations” on each one. He recommends the study of texts by Charles Rosen, Donald Tovey, Edwin Fischer and András Schiff for further analysis and technical scrutiny.
Now where does all this leave the listener? Does this “fresh approach” nullify the important recordings of these late sonatas made by such virtuosos as Alfred Brendel, Mitsuko Uchida, András Schiff, or Vladimir Ashkenazy? I am not a Beethoven enthusiast or cognoscenti, although I enjoy, and hopefully appreciate much of his work. When I wish to hear any one of the late sonatas, I turn to Alfred Brendel’s 1975 recording. This has always been sufficient for me.
So, for the “average” Beethoven listener, will they notice
the difference between this new recording by Emil Gryesten and their usual
fare? I am not convinced they will. I certainly did not, short of comparing many
versions, which I have neither the resources nor the inclination to do. Unless
time is to be devoted to a close reading of these sonatas with the scores and
technical analysis, I guess that listeners will just have to thoroughly enjoy
them.
The bottom line is: did these performances move me; did they
inspire me? The answer is a big Yes! This is a splendid recital with wonderful
playing: I will leave the theoretical underpinnings to the experts and the
pedants.
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
CD1:
Sonata No. 28 in A Major, op. 101 (1816)
Sonata No. 29 in B-Flat Major, op. 106 "Hammerklavier” (1817-18)
CD2:
Sonata No. 30 in E Major, op. 109 (1820)
Sonata No. 31 in A-Flat Major, op. 110 (1821)
Sonata No. 32 in C minor, op.111 (1821-22)
Emil Gryesten (piano)
rec. 3-5 April and 24-26 July 2023, Main Concert Hall, Royal Danish Academy of Music, Copenhagen
Danacord DACOCD 973 [2CDs 122]
No comments:
Post a Comment