I remarked at the end of my post
about Humphrey Searle’s Night Music
that it seemed remarkable that there is only a single recording of this work.
At the time its composition, there
was plan for Decca to record all the pieces that had been selected for
inclusion in the Committee for the Promotion of New Music rehearsal concerts.
In fact, few, if any of these were ever recorded.
In 1996, CPO records released the
first of two CDs featuring the cycle of symphonies by Humphrey Searle. This
included Symphonies Nos, 2, 3 and 5 (CPO 999 376-2). Three years later, the two
remaining Symphonies were issued. Included on this second CD were two orchestral
works: the present Night Music, op.2
(1943) and the Overture to a Drama,
op.17 (1949). Except for the 1st and the 2nd Symphonies, which had been released
on Decca SXL 2232 and Lyrita SRCS 72 respectively, these are all premiere
recordings.
Reviewing the recording of the
Symphonies Nos. 2, 3 & 5 Michael Oliver (MEO) (The Gramophone February 1997) praised the ‘performances and
recordings [which] are so good that a companion disc of his First and Fourth
Symphonies would be welcome [eventually released]. Enthusiastically, he suggested
that this symphonic cycle ‘might lead to a demand…for recordings of [Searle’s]
strikingly original trilogy of melodramas for speaker and orchestra, Gold Coast Customs, The Riverrun and The
Shadow of Cain. [yet to happen].
MEOs final thought was ‘Dour and
grey Searle certainly wasn’t; there’s even a brief hint of jovial humour in the
Fifth Symphony. Indeed, this disc demonstrates that among British symphonists
of his period (Arnold, Frankel, Fricker, Lloyd, Rawsthorne, Simpson) Searle
stands higher than most.'
Robert Layton (The Gramophone, May 1999) summed Searle’s
symphonic success. Readers are reminded about the ‘ongoing success’ of CPOs
Benjamin Frankel symphonic cycle. Layton suggests that ‘at his best, Searle is
a rewarding composer under whose dodecaphony beats a human heart’ in spite of
his music not being immediately ‘accessible’.
He notes that the Fourth Symphony is ‘perhaps Searle’s most austere and
elusive work…a formidably gripping piece.’
The major review of the CPO recording
of Night Music was presented in The Gramophone (April 1999). Once again, the task was taken up by MEO. He believed
that this CD ‘gives and admirable indication of the sheer variety that lies behind
the off-putting label that Humphrey Searle has acquired in many people’s minds:
atonal Cheltenham Symphonist.’ Regarding Night
Music, which he considers to be an ‘uncommonly assured and accomplished op.2’:
it presents a ‘likeable’ work in spite of its ‘battery of learned contrapuntal
devices.’ He concludes that the entire
CD contains ‘admirable performances’ and is ‘finely recorded.’
A specific comment about Night Music appeared in Philip Haldeman’s
review for the American Record Guide
(July 2005). He thought that it ‘is more contrapuntal and linear than anything
else here. The mood is nocturnal, but not lush, with piquant woodwinds that
seem to mock the more serious aura of night.’ A few months later, Jerry Dubins
writing in Fanfare (September 200) thought
that Night Music, dedicated to Webern
on his 60th birthday, (1943) contains some of the creepiest horror-movie music
you've ever heard.
I have come to enjoy Night Music
and think that it makes an excellent introduction to Humphrey Searle’s musical achievement.
Discography
Alun Francis, BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra, Humphrey Searle Symphonies No.2, op.33,
No.3, op.36 and No.5, op.43, CPO 999 376-2, 1996.
Alun Francis, BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra, Humphrey Searle Symphonies Nos.1, op,23,
No.4, op.38, Night Music, op.2, Overture to a Drama, op.17 CPO 999 541-2,
1999.
No comments:
Post a Comment