When I was looking through some old posts on my Land of Lost Content Blog I found that
in 2008 I had posted this review originally published on MusicWeb International. On my blog, it had become corrupted with some missing text and the fonts
lacking uniformity. I have no hesitation in posting this again. I have
corrected a few typos and matters of style but have not changed the content or sentiment of the review. It remains my
all-time Desert Island Disc.
I must confess that at the age of
about 16, I fell in love with Peers Coetmore. I recall buying the original
Lyrita vinyl album (SRCS.43) of Moeran’s Cello Concerto from a shop called
Cuthbertson’s in Cambridge Street, Glasgow. On the cover of that LP was a
lovely photograph of Moeran and Peers looking out over a hilly landscape from Worcestershire Beacon in the Malvern's. It fulfilled all my youthful romantic notions of love,
landscape and music. Since that time the Cello Concerto has been my number one
Desert Island Disc. It has never, in 48 years, been usurped from that position.
Despite a certain critical downer on Peer’s playing, it will always remain for
me the definitive performance of this masterly work.
A few biographical notes about
the composer may be helpful. Ernest John (Jack) Moeran was born at Heston,
Middlesex on 31st December
1894 . He was the son of an Irish clergyman working in Norfolk , so church music
was a part of his upbringing. He attended what was at that time the most
musical of all the public schools, Uppingham. His teacher there was Robert
Sterndale Bennett, the grandson of the British composer, William.
On leaving school in 1913, he
enrolled as a student at the Royal College of Music . The course was to be short lived. Upon the
start of hostilities in 1914, Moeran enlisted in the Army. After service on the
Western Front he returned to England
with a serious head wound: he never fully recovered from this injury.
After the war he had some musical
instruction from John Ireland. However, most of his musical learning came from
his two companions - Bernard van Dieren and Philip Heseltine (Peter Warlock).
Although regarded as an ‘English’
composer, Moeran had an Irish streak in his blood: his father was born in Dublin ! He was always to
love that great country and its people.
Finally, Moeran was to die on the
banks of the River Kenmare on 1st
December 1950 , from what was thought to be a brain haemorrhage.
Stylistically Moeran’s music
changed from the ‘Irelandesque’ piano music of the early ‘twenties, through
more folksong-inspired works and the ‘high’ romanticism of the Symphony in G minor to a new, personal,
even neo-classical style forged during and after the Second World War. Yet,
underlying all these so called ‘periods’ is a concern for structure and a warm,
lyrical tone that is always a feature of Moeran’s music.
To understand the context of the
works for cello it is necessary to look at Moeran’s relationship with the
cellist Peers Coetmore- originally Kathleen Coetmore-Jones. The composer first
met Peers in 1930 whilst visiting the painter Augustus John. She had been an
exceptional pupil at the Royal Academy of Music ,
winning a number of prizes. Nothing came of this first encounter.
Many years later they were to
meet once again at a concert in Leominster. This time their friendship developed
and, for Moeran at any rate, it developed into love.
One of the outcomes of this
relationship was a number of cello works dedicated to her.
On 26th July 1945 the couple were married.
However it was not a particularly ‘successful’ union. Moeran needed to escape
into solitude and Peers had considerable professional commitments which led to
long separations. Gradually they drifted apart, with Peers finally working in Australia . All
one can say is that as a couple they were ‘incompatible’. Yet they shared some
happy moments, and this is well reflected in the one or two surviving
photographs of the couple.
Geoffrey Self mentions four works
composed for solo violoncello in his book The
Music of E. J. Moeran
(1986). These are the Concerto for cello
and orchestra of 1945, the Prelude for cello and piano of 1943, the Irish Lament of 1944 and the Sonata, for
cello and piano of 1947.
The Prelude for Cello and piano
is a simple, yet profound piece. A broad and lyrical melody is played over an
extremely simple accompaniment. Common
chords and secondary sevenths are the staple harmonic feature. The Prelude was
Moeran’s first piece which he dedicated to Peers. It was gifted to her as a
‘keepsake’ whilst she was on tour with ENSA during the war. Strangely, but not surprisingly, the first
performance of the piece was in Alexandria
in Egypt .
Self does not rate the piece
highly. He writes ‘it is a work of little distinction; the cello melody is
shapely enough, but the piano part is frankly dull. It is....doomed to a humble
place in grade examination lists.’
Yet perhaps the ‘dullness’ of the
piano part gives the piece much of its charm. The lyrical quality of the melody
is allowed to predominate without competition from the piano. The overriding
characteristic of this piece is warmth. The Prelude was published by Novello in
1944
I am sorry that the Irish Lament
does not appear to have been recorded by Peers Coetmore and Eric Parkin. I
assume that if it had been, then it would have appeared on this CD. The Lament
was based on a ‘genuine’ Irish folk song. It was composed in 1944 and was
published by Novello in the same year.
The Cello Sonata has been
regarded as Moeran’s most accomplished work. Whether this true is probably a
matter of taste rather than judgement. However in this piece the composer seems
to strike a good balance between his various styles and influences: neo-classicism and romanticism come together
in a satisfying unity. The composer wrote in a letter to Peers, ‘I have just
spent all yesterday on cello sonata proofs. You know I don’t usually boast, but
coming back to it, going through it note by note, and looking at it
impartially, I honestly think it is a masterpiece. I can’t think how I ever
managed to write it.’
Critics have noticed allusions to
Bax and even to Bartok in the working out of the Sonata. Yet it is difficult to
try to explain this or that passage in terms of influence. For this is a distinctive
work by Moeran: it is mature and self-assured and never verges on parody or
plagiarism.
The Cello Sonata is, to be frank, a depressing piece. Some of the pages
have been likened to the peat bogs of Ireland : gloomy and dark. There are moments of optimism and occasional
flashes of light but surely the lasting impression is of quiet and shadowy
restraint and perhaps even melancholy.
The Sonata has three movements -
Tempo Moderato-Allegro, Adagio and Allegro. The first performance was given in Dublin by Peers Coetmore
on the 9th May 1947 .
Charles Lynch was the pianist. It was published by Novello in 1948.
The world of British Cello
Concertos is fairly sparse –at least when compared to symphonic works.
Naturally every example of the genre is understood in light of the great and
ubiquitous Concerto in E minor by Sir
Edward Elgar. In fact, many music-lovers would be hard pressed to name another
example. There are a number of fine concerti – including those by Arthur
Sullivan, Alan Rawsthorne, Gerald Finzi, Frank Bridge and Kenneth Leighton to
name but five. And from Central Europe is the great work by Anton Dvorak: this
is regarded by Geoffrey Self as seminal for Moeran’s Concerto.
The Cello Concerto is surely the
highlight of this present CD release. This is a work that manages to balance
the formal constructs of a classical concerto with the beauties of Irish folk
tunes. Many critics hold Raphael Wallfisch’s interpretation of the Concerto to
be definitive. However, I have to hold my hand up and say that although I have
enjoyed Wallfisch’s performances of this work – both at the Barbican Hall and
on Chandos with Norman del Mar, I do not find it as satisfying as the
Coetmore/Boult version. I have thought long and hard about this and I think
that there are two good reasons why I take this stand.
Firstly, it is well known that
Peers Coetmore had a style of playing that was more appropriate to chamber
music. Moeran was conscious of this limitation – if that what it was. The work
uses the orchestra as a partner for the soloist – not as an adversary. The work
was created solely for her: he wrote ‘I would not allow anyone else to play it
and I will not, while it is still under my control…’ Earlier he had written to
Peers with enthusiasm, ‘Now please write and tell me you would like me to write
a concerto specially for you, and I give you my promise that I will put my
whole heart into it…I will be able to walk the Kerry Mountains with a real
happy object in view.’ It was to be their own special work – a union of player
and composer.
Certainly this present recording
has been criticised for giving ‘an inadequate picture of this work’ and the
reason given is that her ‘insight is not matched by playing of sufficient
strength or skill.’ Now to my ear what Wallfisch
clearly lacks is the insight to Moeran’s mood, his loves and quite natrually
his feelings for his wife. I feel that Wallfisch gives a ‘big’ performance that
sometime overwhelms the intimacy of this work.
Interestingly the reviewer of the
Manchester HallĂ© performance was impressed by Peer’s playing. He wrote that she
gave a ‘delightfully spirited performance.’ He notes that ‘once or twice a
slightly doubtful intonation was heard.’ But finally he considers that the ‘general
firmness and fluency of Miss Coetmore’s playing were as admirable as its
interpretive range.’
Secondly, Peers manages to
balance the various elements of this work in a more satisfying manner that
Wallfisch. She empathises with the Celtic nature of many of the themes of the
works - yet she never allows the Irishry to subsume those more urbane passages
of which there are not a few. She brings a heart-rending beauty to the slow
movement and a genuine sense of optimism to the finale. I have long felt that that
this recording –made nearly twenty years after Moeran’s death- is to be
regarded as Peers’s mature reflection of her life and love with Jack. And as
such it is totally indispensable.
One last thought: it is not
possible to read a definite programme into the Cello Concerto or any of the works written for Miss Coetmore: they
are not ‘autobiographies’. However, it is clear that in many pages and passages
of these works Ernest John Moeran expressed the genuine, deep love and devotion
he felt for Peers.
Track Listing:
E.J. Moeran (1894-1950)
Cello Concerto (1945)
Cello Sonata (1948)
Prelude for cello
and piano (1944)
Peers Coetmore (cello) Eric Parkin (piano)
London Philharmonic Orchestra/Sir Adrian Boult
Lyrita SRCD.299
ADD
1 comment:
I enjoyed reading your analysis.I have never worried too much about Coetmore's playing. For me it is perfect for what Moeran had to say.It isnt just music, but an intertwining of composer,performer, love, hope and disappointment. A wonderful recording, my all time favourite.
Post a Comment