It is easy to condemn Arnold
Cooke for his ‘Germanic’ debt to Paul Hindemith and the resulting ‘Cheltenham’
symphonic style. In fact, this glib assessment has probably done much to
minimize Cooke’s impact on British music. Malcolm MacDonald sums up Cooke’s
debt to Hindemith in the programme note to Lyrita SRCD 203. MacDonald writes
that what he “really imbibed [from Hindemith] was a broad framework of
technique and a sense of direction: a view of music as a living polyphonic
entity and a feeling for individual instruments that goes back to the practice
of J.S Bach.”
Arnold Cooke was born in Gomersal
in the West Riding of Yorkshire on 4 November 1906. He gained his B.Mus. from
Cambridge in 1929. After this, he departed to Berlin where he was a student of
Paul Hindemith at the Hochschule
für Musik for four years. On
returning to England in 1932 he held a number of appointments including
director of Cambridge Festival Theatre, and a Professorship of Composition at
the Manchester College of Music (now the Royal Northern College of Music).
During the Second World War he served in the Royal Navy. After demob, Cooke was
professor of harmony, counterpoint and composition at Trinity College of Music,
London. He remained in this post until his retirement in 1978.
Cooke eschewed various modernist
techniques such as serialism, and was never attracted to the avant garde. He
wrote that his music is ‘mainly based on traditional procedures and
principles…I do not have any particular theories of composition, just a natural
inclination for it.’ His music is eclectic, approachable and firmly rooted in
traditional tonality spiced with dissonance and a modicum of ‘Bartokian
ruggedness.’ Although there is little in the way of British nationalism in his
style, there is a certain ‘English lyricism’ that adds warmth to his music.
He has composed a wide range of
music including an opera, Mary Barton,
a ballet, Jabez and the Devil, six
symphonies, a number of concertos, choral works, songs, and chamber music. Arnold
Cooke died on 13 August 2005 at his home in Five Oak Green in Kent: he lived to
the grand old age of 98 years.
Brian Wilson in his review of
this CD on MusicWeb International points out to the listener that they may not
‘fear that [Cooke’s] symphonies composed in the 1970s will be filled with all
sorts of avant-garde features then in vogue…’ In fact, criticism is liable to
come from the other direction that Cooke was outdated, unchallenging and a
martyr to Elisabeth Lutyens swinging criticism of the ‘Wenceslas Generation’,
who followed in their masters’ footsteps. In fact I am not sure that any
symphony by Cooke was premiered at Cheltenham. The violin and the clarinet
concertos along with the Piano Sonata No.2 were
first heard here.
As an aside, Lutyens also called
RVW’s followers ‘corn merchants’ not to be confused with Walton’s dubbing of
Humphrey Searle and Lutyens herself as the ‘twelve tone Reds’.
Cooke’s Symphony No.4 was a Philharmonic
Society Commission completed in 1974. The first performance was at the Royal
Festival Hall on 15 January 1975. John Pritchard conducted the BBC Symphony
Orchestra.
Meirion Bowen, reviewing the
Symphony in The Guardian (16 January
1975) suggested that if a future edition of Radio 3’s once popular programme The Innocent Ear were to play this work,
listeners would be baffled. Was it a forgotten essay by Paul Hindemith or a
discovery from the pen of Anton Bruckner?
Four years later, Arnold Cooke finished
his Symphony No.5 in G major. It was first heard on a BBC broadcast on 17 July
1981 as part of the Midday Concert. The
Symphony had been recorded on 28 January by the BBC Symphony Orchestra and was
conducted by Bernard Keefe at the New Broadcasting House in Manchester. I was
particularly impressed by the woodwind writing in the slow movement featuring
oboe and clarinet. It is a lovely moment that the listener wants to last for
ever. I enjoyed some of the urbane and thoughtful writing in the trio section
of the scherzo.
Two things struck me about these
symphonies. Firstly, they are both written in traditional four-movement form
with the slow movement in second position. Bowen noted that Symphony No.4 was
‘crystal clear to follow, perfectly proportioned in the best academic
traditions.’ I do hope that he is not using the word ‘academic’ here
pejoratively. The same comment could apply to Symphony No.5. Undoubtedly, at this time in musical history any
symphony written in this style would have stood out from the crowd – it was an
era or experimentation, breakdown of tradition and musical offence, often for
the sake of causing offence. This is not the whole story, as a glance at Eric
Gilder’s listings for the latter half of the 1970s will show: there was still
much ‘tonal’ music on the horizon.
However, ‘progressive’ music was usually seen as the future, whether
listeners appreciated/enjoyed it or not. Arnold Cooke’s Symphonies must have
appeared reactionary or naive to the avant-garde’.
Secondly, I would suggest that
whoever Cooke’s models were (and this may include Havergal Brian) he has
synthesised them into his own voice.
Whatever the continental influences, Cooke is a British composer and
this is evident in the mood and style of many passages, especially in the slow
movements. This applies to much of his
other music as well.
I enjoyed both these symphonies.
It is a great luxury that listeners in 2016 can look back 40 years and be
untroubled by ‘isms’. We do not worry about what our musical ‘superiors’ tell
us is important and vital and to what we ‘ought’ to listen. There is much of interest in these two works:
I was impressed and often moved by what I heard here.
The production of this CD is outstanding:
after more than 45 years of listening to their records, I expect no less from
Lyrita. The re-mastering of these two radio broadcasts seem to me to be near-perfect.
Paul Conway gives a detailed analysis of both symphonies which deserve study
before listening.
Eric Wetherell, in his short
monograph on the composer (BMS No.3, 1996) suggested that ‘chief amongst
Cooke’s orchestral works are his six symphonies.’ He adds that they are rarely
heard. I have done a few searches on the ‘net and find little evidence of any
further performances of these two distinguished pieces in the concert hall. I
understand that the Symphony No.6, which was completed in 1986 has yet to be
performed. (I look forward to being contradicted on both these points!)
We are lucky in having four of
Cooke’s six symphonies (Nos.1, 3, 4 & 5). One can only hope that one day
[soon] the entire cycle will be complete. Based on what I have heard, Cooke is an
important ‘symphonist’ that deserves his place in the symphonic repertoire.
Track Listings:-
Arnold COOKE (1906-2005)
Symphony No.4 in E flat (1974)
Symphony No.5 in G (1979)
BBC Symphony Orchestra/John Pritchard (Symphony No.4), BBC
Northern Symphony Orchestra/Bernard Keeffe (Symphony No.5)
LYRITA REAM 1123
MONO
With thanks to MusicWeb International where this review was first published.
Aha, I see now that the old photograph accompanying your article - which was of the old yellow-cover Lyrita recording that DID include the "Jabez" music, has now changed to a different one that does NOT include the ballet music... That will explain it!
ReplyDelete