Further to my last post on the
premiere of Charles Villiers Stanford’s Piano Concerto No.2 in C minor, op.126,
I found this contemporary review in the New
York Tribune (6 June 1915). It needs little commentary, however I have
provided a few notes.
‘The absence of Sir Charles Villiers
Stanford was greatly deplored. [1] His presence would have given the festival a
crowning glory, like that lent to the festival last year by the presence of Mr.
Sibelius. Stanford has gathered unto himself nearly all the titular honors
within the gift of British institutions, including the throne. He is D.C.L.,
and LL.D., and doubly a Mus. Doc. Of Oxon and Cantab. He was knighted in 1901:
is not only an Irishman, but is a patriot at least musically. [2] [3] To his
patriotism and his love of learning he bore testimony when on the score of his
Irish Symphony he wrote a Latin distich, saying “Graciously favour thy native
isle and him who sings of thy native land, O Phoebus, thou who singest with a
crowned lyre.” [4] That symphony was to have been played under his direction at
the last concert on Tuesday evening. Of all Sir Charles’s works it is the best known
in New York, where it was performed by the Symphony Society under Mr. Walter
Damrosch in January, 1888. It had been composed only a few months before, but
before it reached New York it had been heard in London, at the Norwich Festival,
in Berlin, Hamburg and Vienna. It has been played in New York several times
since, the last time I believe, by the Philharmonic Society, under the
direction of Mr. [Gustav] Mahler, in February, 1911. It lives in pleasant memory,
as does also the opera “Shamus O’Brien” which had a series of representations
in New York. Irish, delightfully Irish, to the core are the symphony and this
opera, and it was in the expectation of hearing what Celtic idioms might be
made to sound like in a piano concerto, no doubt, that many looked forward to
the novelty of Thursday evening.
Mr. Harold Bauer has prepared the
solo part with care, and played it with complete devotion. The orchestra, under
Arthur Mees, did its duty fully, and the audience found the work greatly to its
taste an liking, for one thing, because it was to its understanding and strove
straightforwardly and consistently to express pure musical beauty. Of
nationalism like that disclosed in “Shamus O’Brien”, the Irish symphony, and
presumably the Irish rhapsodies, and Dances for orchestra, the Irish Idyll for
pianoforte and orchestra, and the Irish fantasies for violin and orchestra [5] which
are in the list of Sir Charles’ compositions, there is not a trace.
Its key is C minor and it is
marked op.126. It was written, I believe, a year or more ago, but its
performance was reserved for the Norfolk Festival. It is in three movements,
the conventional three movements, one is obliged to say in this case, the middle
slow one bearing the greatest burden of simple, soulful though not profoundly poetic
beauty. The last movement in triple time with a theme proclaimed at the outset
in full chordal harmony, is bright and militant, with a retrospective glance at
the slow movement as a short episode. Good, sound music all of it, with a
spirit that proceeded from Schumann. Most admirably pianistic it is throughout
and scored with a master hand. Our musical Hotspurs will decry it as smugly
academic, but it has a clear musical face, it knows its purpose, it achieves
it, and if Mr. Bauer plays it in the musical capitals of America next season he
will bring delight to thousands who love music for what it is rather than what
the so-called modernists say they think it ought to be.
The New York Tribune
6 June 1915 H.E Krehbiel
Notes:
[1] Jeremy Dibble, in his
biography Charles Villiers Stanford: Man
and Musician, Oxford Univeristy Press, 2002) has given a detailed explanation
of the circumstances leading up to the composer being unable to attend the 1915
Norfolk Festival. Unsurprisingly, it was due to the wartime situation, and the
danger in crossing the Atlantic by ship. Scarily, Stanford and his wife had
been booked on the Lusitania on 15 May 1915. She was sunk by the Germans on 7 May, with the
loss of 1198 passengers and members of the crew.
[2] Stanford received many honours during his lifetime, including the honorary degrees of DMus (Oxford,
1883), MusD (Cambridge, 1888), DCL (Durham, 1894), LLD (Leeds, 1904), and MusD
(Trinity College, Dublin, 1921). He was knighted in 1902 and in 1904 was
elected a member of the Royal Academy of Arts of Berlin. (National
Biography)
[3] There is no doubt about Charles Villiers Stanford’s
patriotism, either musically or politically. It must be recalled that he was a
Unionist, who was politically opposed to Home Rule. He was exceptionally proud
of Ireland and retained his Irish ‘brogue’
through all his years in London. He had no difficulty in regarding himself as ‘patriotic
Irishman and British loyalist.’ Many of his works evoke the spirit of the land
of his birth.
[4]
“Ipse fave
clemens patriae patriamque canenti,/Phcebe, coronata qui canis
ipse lyra." This was seemingly made up by Stanford and is not a quote
from classical authors.
[5]
The author of the review would seem to be confusing the Irish Idyll in Six Miniatures
for voice and piano, op.77 for something a little more substantial. The Irish
Fantasies, op.54 were for violin and piano, not orchestra.
Listening to the slow movement of the concerto, I am strongly reminded of the slow movement of Sullivan's "Irish" Symphony. Triple time, with a sustained melody beginning on the mediant of the scale.
ReplyDeleteThe echo is probably just a coincidental as the long sustained note of Sullivan's movement is reminiscent of the similar Holst's "Saturn".
And, as Sullivan is supposed to have said, "We only have twelve notes to choose from" (or words to that effect).