The key question about Havergal
Brian’s Violin Concerto in C major is
whether it ought to be regarded as one of the great British concertos or
whether it deserves its relative obscurity.
Now, the Brian aficionado will
insist that this work is a masterpiece and deserves to be taken up by any
number of leading soloists and orchestras. But what is the competition? I am
sure that the readers do not need to be read a lecture on the repertoire,
however it is worth a few moments just listing the some key British works in
this genre.
Few would argue that the leading
contenders are Edward Elgar and William Walton. However, it would be unfair to
disregard E.J. Moeran and Benjamin Britten. Another name to be reckoned with is
Alan Rawsthorne who composed two excellent examples of the genre which have
been recorded by Naxos. The little appreciated work by Fred. Delius is actually
rather good. And the offerings by Ralph Vaughan Williams, Samuel Coleridge-Taylor
and Arthur Somervell should not be ignored. In recent years there is the
stunning Violin Concerto by Lionel Sainsbury. Yet, it is the Elgar and the
Walton concerti that really count in the concert halls and on record. I have
loved these two works since I was a teenager: both of them reach for the stars
and touch the moon. And they have one distinct advantage. They are exposed to
the public. They are heard at concerts and on the radio: scores are available
for perusal by the musically literate. There are essays available to assist
with analysis. And finally, biographies and letters of these composers help us
find our way through these pages.
What are we to make of Havergal Brian’s
Concerto? Firstly, this is not a new work – it has been around for 70 years.
However it had to wait until 1969 before receiving its first performance by
Ralph Holmes and the New Philharmonia Orchestra. It is currently available on a
Naxos disc which is a re-release: it was originally issued on Marco Polo over 15
years ago.
Secondly, the first performance
of this piece (1969) was at a time when tonal music was at an all time low. In
fact, it was likely to have been regarded as being passé by most learned
critics at that time. A composer like Havergal Brian was not appreciated. The
concerto, although receiving fine reviews, would not catch the eye of the cognoscenti.
It would be left to the enthusiasts of Brian’s music to carry the torch. In the
second decade of the 21st century we are less inclined to write-off a work
because it does not conform to the latest ideas on musical composition. So the
work has a good chance of being heard, enjoyed and appreciated without being
condemned.
And lastly, in spite of the
efforts of the Havergal Brian Society,
I doubt that his name will ever rank with Walton and Elgar in the musical
public’s perception.
However, after a number of
hearings, I am convinced that this work will complete the triangle of key
violin concertos produced in the 20th century in the United
Kingdom.
But first of all it is helpful to
give a brief resume of the genesis of this great concerto. I rely heavily on
the excellent programme notes written by Malcolm MacDonald for the Naxos
recording. Brian had composed his Fourth
Symphony in 1933 and decided to embark on the composition of a large scale
work -the Violin Concerto. As a child,
Brian had learnt to play the violin, so it was natural that he should turn to
this particular form.
The draft score was completed by
June 1934 but unfortunately it was lost on a train trip from Brighton to London
Victoria – his briefcase was stolen or mislaid. Typically, he set to work
straight away to recover lost ground. He did not try to reconstruct the work from
memory but effectively created a new work using what themes and progressions he
could recall from the original. The ‘new’ work was finished in the summer of
1935 and was initially called Violin
Concerto No.2. It was subtitled ‘The
Heroic’ which aptly summed up the effort Brian put into creating this
masterpiece. Eventually the composer dropped the No.2 and the name and it became known as Violin Concerto in C major.
It is superfluous to describe the
musical progress of this work. The programme
notes give a detailed analysis of each movement and the listener can peruse
this at leisure. Furthermore it is difficult to try to say what the work sounds
like. All sorts of allusions spring to mind. And one of my criticisms of the
Brian’s music is that it can sometimes be a little too eclectic. One minute we
are reminded of Elgar, then the next Schoenberg and perhaps a few bars later
Shostakovich. But at the end of the day the end result is typically Havergal
Brian.
The work is in three movements –
two ‘allegros’ sandwich a ‘passacaglia’. On my first hearing, I felt that the
work seemed unbalanced, but with further hearings it fell into place for me.
The equilibrium between the soloist and the orchestra, which can ruin many a
good concerto, seems just about right.
One of Havergal Brian’s
fingerprints is the tensions in his use of musical language. Much of this work
is quite obviously tonal – yet, suddenly he pushes towards an atonality that
would have made Ligetti proud! Some of his ‘tunes’ are diatonic and nod towards
folk-music but others suggest the breakdown of the key signature. Some melodies
could be whistled by the proverbial ‘butcher’s boy on his bicycle’ – others
would seem to defy analysis. Often Brian’s harmonies are conventional sometimes
they are harsh. Yet the balance is always right. He never loses the plot.
The greatness of this Violin
Concerto lies in the well-contrived tension between competing elements and
styles. There is an overt simplicity about much of this music that harks back
to a more pastoral age, yet some of the more complex passages owe more to Berg
and Schoenberg than to English folk song. Much of this concerto is intense,
probing the very heart of music and perhaps life itself. This is expressly so
in the Lento. Sometimes there is a serenity that lulls the listener into a
false sense of security. Occasionally the music appears naïve – there is a
passage in the last movement that is almost childish. Yet the balance remains;
the equilibrium is never lost. The artistic integrity is never misplaced.
The final recommendation for this
work is the blatantly obvious fact that Brian has used the great romantic
concertos of the past as models. Of course he knew the Elgar and the Dvorak and
the Tchaikovsky. He has not copied or even parodied any of these works. What he
has done is learnt the lessons of their style and their balance and created a
masterpiece in his own right.
Havergal Brian’s Violin Concerto
is available on NAXOS
8.557775
I have long been fascinated by Brian's music - ever since the performance of the Gothic I went to as a school boy! Having listened to quite a lot of his work I do feel that specially with his later music he suffered greatly from composing rather in a vacuum and in particular not having the important self-critical 'feedback' that comes from actually hearing things performed by live musicians rather than it all existing in your head. However, I don't know this violin concerto, but if as you say it really bears comparison with the Elgar and Walton, then I certainly must hear it!
ReplyDelete