Over the Christmas period I had the pleasure of reviewing
this excellent re-release of the Belcea Quartet’s account of the great cycle of
Benjamin Britten’s String Quartets.
For enthusiasts of Britten’s music in particular and
English music in general this is an important and exciting event and I was
privileged “to have this spectacular release in my collection.”
Michael
Cookson has written an extensive essay and comparison of these
quartets for MusicWeb International and my review did not attempt to compete
with this essential reading! I agreed with Michael’s statement that there are
“so many excellent accounts of his [Britten’s] String Quartets available…”
that it could be a hard choice for the a person approaching these works for the
first time.
I considered the disparity between numbers of recordings-
“The Arkiv CD database notes some eleven or twelve recordings of the Second and Third Quartets,
whereas the First has only five”.
Furthermore, I agreed with him that few listeners would be
disappointed with the three main contenders for attention –the Maggini, the
Sorrel or the Belcea versions. Naturally, I was forced to come down on one side
and state my preference – I suggested that “I would not like to be forced to
choose one single version for my library – I believe that all three bring
important insights. I guess that if the chips were down it would be the Belcea
CDs for the overall interpretation. However, the Sorrel version (on Chandos
would be my choice for ‘value for money’ –as they had the two un-numbered
Quartets from 1928 and 1931 and the Alla Marcia as additional material.
Please read my full review at MusicWeb
International
No comments:
Post a Comment